The Madras High Court’s recent order refusing to permit
 camel slaughter in Tamil Nadu during the Bakrid festival has evoked 
mixed reactions among Islamic outfits and animal rights activists.
Opposing
 the verdict, M.H. Jawahirullah, president, Manithaneya Makkal Katchi, 
said that the verdict would be challenged in the Supreme Court since it 
impinges on the rights of Muslims to practice their faith. “According to
 Islam, Muslims can sacrifice a bull, goat or a camel for Bakrid. It is 
one of the obligations of Muslims. How can a Muslim, who wants to 
sacrifice a camel, be barred from doing it?” he asked, adding “We will 
challenge it.”
According to him, the ban contradicts 
Article 25 of the Constitution, which states that “all persons are 
equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to 
profess, practise and propagate religion.”
Where as ;
 Animal rights activists, meanwhile, claim that the court has a given a 
major boost to animal rights by banning camel slaughter. “I am delighted
 by the verdict,” said V.C. Chinny Krishna, vice-chairman, Animal 
Welfare Board of India.
 Stating that rules of Food and Security Act certifies only five types of 
animals fit for consumption (bovines, pigs, poultry, sheep/goat and 
fish), he said that slaughtering camels is simply illegal. “Also, any 
animal that is being killed has to be done so in a slaughter house. When
 religious practices contravene the law of the land, the law of the land
 must prevail over it,” he said.

 
No comments:
Post a Comment